Dinostar77 wrote:The first four games in that list were revolutionary, gta3 should have been the 5th. After that the list becomes a bit hit and miss.
Dark Souls is the clearest of 10s in that series (but I would say that), BB is debatable - the weapons and combat make a good case for it.Tempy wrote:Skyward Sword sticks out for me as well, and although Bloodborne is easily my favourite of that series, and in some aspects utterly sublime, I don't see it as a [10]
Tempy wrote:The king of the MOBA is and always will be DOTA
Dinostar77 wrote:I stand corrected, as I know nothing about themTempy wrote:The king of the MOBA is and always will be DOTA
JonB wrote:It's all a strange argument in the end though. It's one thing to say 10 should mean something, but then the difference between 9s and 10s may ultimately be minuscule.
JonB wrote:Dark Souls is the clearest of 10s in that series (but I would say that), BB is debatable - the weapons and combat make a good case for it.Tempy wrote:Skyward Sword sticks out for me as well, and although Bloodborne is easily my favourite of that series, and in some aspects utterly sublime, I don't see it as a [10]
TBH I think most of the retrospective 10s are pretty deserving, so perhaps more a sign Edge should've been more generous in the past than anything else.
Paul the sparky wrote:I don't like the revolutionary bit. A game could absolutely nail everything it sets out to do in an existing genre and be worthy of a [10], it doesn't have to revolutionise anything for me.
Dinostar77 wrote:COD4: bought mutiplayer online shooter to the masses.
I think there are some like that as well. Bayonetta and Mario Galaxies, for example.Paul the sparky wrote:I don't like the revolutionary bit. A game could absolutely nail everything it sets out to do in an existing genre and be worthy of a [10], it doesn't have to revolutionise anything for me.
regmcfly wrote:Agree and agree. There's a real whiff of nostalgia cum gatekeeperism about the chat in here, as if modern games haven't, yknow, got better or something. I'm not going to argue every single one of them is a stone cold 10, but the increase may be to do with the rise in general quality, the mainstreaming of games, the fact there's more games out now, or just maybe opinion. Find the whole 'an edge 10 use to mean something' argument bafflesome.
Paul the sparky wrote:I don't like the revolutionary bit. A game could absolutely nail everything it sets out to do in an existing genre and be worthy of a [10], it doesn't have to revolutionise anything for me.
Paul the sparky wrote:I don't like the revolutionary bit. A game could absolutely nail everything it sets out to do in an existing genre and be worthy of a [10], it doesn't have to revolutionise anything for me.
WorKid wrote:The Orange Box can fuck off with its 10. Putting two 9s and an 8 on the same DVD does not make a 10.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!