Escape wrote:Retro Gamer's articles are largely filler; you read them and realise you've read nothing.
Moot_Geeza wrote:I subscribe and I enjoy it more than other modern game mags, but unfortunately this is spot on.Escape wrote:Retro Gamer's articles are largely filler; you read them and realise you've read nothing.
Tempy wrote:Is there a credit for the screenshots? Wondering if it's Duncan Harris (DeadEndThrills) who is currently being praised for his work in the Bitmap Brothers this week.
Moot_Geeza wrote:Sometimes it's just nice to be reminded of things though.
Escape wrote:I spoke to someone a while ago about the legal issues of publishing photos, which is why Retro Gamer always use that PlayStation with the green memory card, I guess - they've clearance on it.
They will likely use the same photo because Retro Gamer have no money, and they don't want to pay someone for another picture.Escape wrote:Well, this guy was talking about capturing sporting events, and how clearance from the subject isn't always enough. If you take a photo of a footballer but capture advertising hoardings in the background, say, you might get stung for publishing that photo if you only have the footballer's permission.
Retro Gamer always use the same PS1 photo, so I'm guessing they can't just grab another one online for a change. I imagine you could photograph your own console. Maybe.
Escape wrote:Saying that, I'm rereading... And it shits all over Retro Gamer. They sourced their own photos - good ones - and went into a lot more detail. Retro Gamer's articles are largely filler; you read them and realise you've read nothing.
Eric wrote:devs pick their favourite game since 1993.
Eric wrote:Well they gave Gunstar Heroes a [6] which was obviously a massive fuck up.
http://worldofstuart.excellentcontent.com/ghedge.htm
It's not very well written either really.
acemuzzy wrote:What's their take on FF?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!