Andy wrote:Well, it’s not ‘making it less safe’. They’re not actively adding harmful pathogens. It’s just choosing not to process the milk. The milk isn’t necessarily unsafe to drink.
As for no apparent reason, there’s a bit of a taste and texture difference to ‘raw’ milk. It was a rather delicious treat when I had it. It may be new to the shop Frosty goes to, but it’s hardly a new thing to farm shops.
As for linking it to the unfair distribution of the world’s resources, please don’t think a few pints being sold unprocessed has any discernible impact on that problem whatsoever.
[font=Roboto, HelveticaNeue, Arial, sans-serif]Pasteurization[/font][font=Roboto, HelveticaNeue, Arial, sans-serif] is a process that kills harmful bacteria by heating [/font][font=Roboto, HelveticaNeue, Arial, sans-serif]milk[/font][font=Roboto, HelveticaNeue, Arial, sans-serif] to a specific temperature for a set period of time. First developed by Louis Pasteur in 1864, [/font][font=Roboto, HelveticaNeue, Arial, sans-serif]pasteurization[/font][font=Roboto, HelveticaNeue, Arial, sans-serif] kills harmful organisms responsible for such diseases as listeriosis, typhoid fever, tuberculosis, diphtheria, and brucellosis.[/font]Andy wrote:Well, it’s not ‘making it less safe’. They’re not actively adding harmful pathogens. It’s just choosing not to process the milk. The milk isn’t necessarily unsafe to drink. As for no apparent reason, there’s a bit of a taste and texture difference to ‘raw’ milk. It was a rather delicious treat when I had it. It may be new to the shop Frosty goes to, but it’s hardly a new thing to farm shops. As for linking it to the unfair distribution of the world’s resources, please don’t think a few pints being sold unprocessed has any discernible impact on that problem whatsoever.
Bob wrote:Pasteurization is a process that kills harmful bacteria by heating milk to a specific temperature for a set period of time. First developed by Louis Pasteur in 1864, pasteurization kills harmful organisms responsible for such diseases as listeriosis, typhoid fever, tuberculosis, diphtheria, and brucellosis. Sounds tasty and just as safe to me.Andy wrote:Well, it’s not ‘making it less safe’. They’re not actively adding harmful pathogens. It’s just choosing not to process the milk. The milk isn’t necessarily unsafe to drink. As for no apparent reason, there’s a bit of a taste and texture difference to ‘raw’ milk. It was a rather delicious treat when I had it. It may be new to the shop Frosty goes to, but it’s hardly a new thing to farm shops. As for linking it to the unfair distribution of the world’s resources, please don’t think a few pints being sold unprocessed has any discernible impact on that problem whatsoever.
Bob wrote:Pasting from google on iPhone the worlds worst fucking phone
Fuck off BobBob wrote:Ahh well that explains Andy
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!