LivDiv wrote:What is the purpose of this essay?
mistercrayon wrote:The last hope of what this Labour Party will stand for is the general election. Johnson will be toast by then and the conservatives will be dead at the next election given how they are cocking everything up now.
Diluted Dante wrote:That's what everyone asked when they annouced he was doing it. After reading it, the question was still there.LivDiv wrote:What is the purpose of this essay?
I think increased tax+gas prices+no food+ no easy trade deals to boast about+ sleaze/deals for the boysDiluted Dante wrote:mistercrayon wrote:The last hope of what this Labour Party will stand for is the general election. Johnson will be toast by then and the conservatives will be dead at the next election given how they are cocking everything up now.
Con (+5)
You are taking this far too personally.Funkstain wrote:if it was "get me to make a fool of myself on a private forum" then job done, Starmer. Well played!Diluted Dante wrote:That's what everyone asked when they annouced he was doing it. After reading it, the question was still there.LivDiv wrote:What is the purpose of this essay?
Rafel Behrs podcast is well worth a listenDiluted Dante wrote:
MattyJ wrote:Pretty sure the British public are in an abusive relationship with the tories at this point. "I know he put me in the hospital with a broken nose but you don't understand I LOVE HIM SHARON"
“In your council home he broke all your bones now you’re taking it time after time”Brooks wrote:It's been ever thus really.Pretty sure the British public are in an abusive relationship with the tories at this point. "I know he put me in the hospital with a broken nose but you don't understand I LOVE HIM SHARON"
Yossarian wrote:We went from Blair to Corbyn in a few years
Starmer becoming PM won’t somehow prevent more left wing Labour leaders in the future.
I also still believe he’d be much better for an awful lot of people than another Conservative
Yossarian wrote:If you decide to do 1, whatever, you’re a cunt.
Voting for a party that will, to some extent, improve the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable in society.
equinox_code wrote:I think another 5 years of Tory rule might force Labour to reassess this centrist bullshit, while a Labour victory will no doubt vindicate all those who said this position on the political compass was the only way forward.
nope. def not. fuck that completely. with this in mind I think I'd sooner vote Tory than Labour if I had to choose. Fortunately I don't.
poprock wrote:Ourpublic servantsruling class, ladies and gentlemen:
Yossarian wrote:I’ll take the least bad option any day of the week, particularly bearing in mind that doing so could have a significant positive impact on the lives of many in society.
Yossarian wrote:Interesting point here about Labour’s potential paths to a GE win, which has recently seemed to often rest on the assumption that the route is through current non-voters:
Escape wrote:Yossarian wrote:If you decide to do 1, whatever, you’re a cunt.
History's littered with enemies making temporary alliances to keep an even more insidious third-party out. I'd never vote Tory (there's no doubt they'd do more next-term damage), but I don't see a way back for the left if Starmer wins, so I hope he doesn't. Johnson instead? Christ, no.
Voting for a party that will, to some extent, improve the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable in society.
How? Where's the policy meat on their hollow chat?
equinox_code wrote:I think another 5 years of Tory rule might force Labour to reassess this centrist bullshit, while a Labour victory will no doubt vindicate all those who said this position on the political compass was the only way forward.
nope. def not. fuck that completely. with this in mind I think I'd sooner vote Tory than Labour if I had to choose. Fortunately I don't.
The serious danger is that a win's a win to this Labour, so they'd plough on with their shittery if they limped home with 8m, no reflection. Any miserable win is a mandate for their closing down of leftwing petition.
Yossarian wrote:I’ll take the least bad option any day of the week, particularly bearing in mind that doing so could have a significant positive impact on the lives of many in society.
Picking the ‘least racist’ at any point in time is still punching the butterfly re: negative future outcomes. When you say significant, and this isn't meant in a diggish way, I feel you've Stockholm syndrome from your employer. Yours is increasingly a different page to the rest of ours here, and that's including former Starmerites. With his hair.
I think you've been taken by the centrist tide, but I don't think you're a centrist. Reconciling giving your support to a man who's offered to lube up first.
monkey wrote:It’s not completely without hope. It needs one transformative leader who is popular with public to get the rest of the party to line up behind whatever they’re proposing. Unfortunately there’s no one who fits the bill.
Diluted Dante wrote:The King of the North?
EvilRedEye wrote:It looks Labour are mulling adopting a policy on proportional representation which if it goes ahead would likely lead to an electoral pact with the Greens, Lib Dems etc. Really hope it goes ahead because it offers a decent chance of outing the Tories in the short term and ending this whole 'have to vote Labour even if they're shit to keep the Tories out' thing in the long-term.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!