davyK wrote:It's good we can discuss it. I felt I was being thought of as someone who would be an apologist for these types of people. That was foolish of me. No fault of anyone here. It's too easy to pick up the wrong tone in posts but I should know better as this place is way above that.
I like to think this place is good for genuine discussion and challenges. It's unique in that respect. I tend to think and post on the hoof and maybe I need to reflect on that. I like thinking out loud - esp on subjects I haven't really thought about or read around too much as I like a collaborative approach to opinion forming and I like to learn from people and dialogue as well as reading.
Inevitably that can sound challenging to people and it's better to do it IRL than on a forum. But this place is so good I feel I can do it. That doesn't always reflect on me too well though.
cosmicjellybean wrote:I wrote this the other day but didn’t post it for whatever reason. I was with my mates in London and they once commented on Spacey and his creepy antics, about 17 years ago. I think the topic on his sexuality came up and they mentioned he liked them younger. Was only a passing comment but it was obviously a well known secret.
Scout wrote:Schofield?
Diluted Dante wrote:As if Neymar has eyes for anyone other than his sister.
yourfavouriteuncle wrote:Absolutely fail to see how that’s some kind of massive expose? Royals were racist (and exceptionalist) in the 60’s and 70’s when, tbf, most of the fucking country was too. Them’s simple known facts.
Unlikely wrote:Define tabloid. In my head that means worthless and to be ignored entirely. Your head is likely different.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!