Armitage_Shankburn wrote:Davie > Starfield. Better batshit than just shit.
digi wrote:Armitage_Shankburn wrote:Davie > Starfield. Better batshit than just shit.
You know it pal.
Fuck that pub grub unless that's all you have!
Kernowgaz wrote:digi wrote:Armitage_Shankburn wrote:Davie > Starfield. Better batshit than just shit.
You know it pal.
Fuck that pub grub unless that's all you have!
Come one Davie, just be honest, why do you hate Microsoft so much? Did they delete one of your Excel spreadsheets or something?
Apart from being a Sony fan boy, what other reasons do you have?
Paul the sparky wrote:I feel sorry for grown men who troll forums on a Saturday night
regmcfly wrote:Digi, I got no skin in this game (don't you come for Mario Wonder) but something like "Starfield is a 2" is a deliberate troll.
I should preface this by saying I don't think starfield is a good game, I think it has some massive flaws, particularly in onboarding.
If we go by Edge standards (fuck it, it's where we came from) myself and Kazuo met an Edge writer at the Festival and drank significantly with them. They revealed a lot (hello GTAIV and Stanton) but also that scores of 4 or below need to indicate significant failings in a game
If 5 is bang average, its a game that just *works* and there are no significant faults.
Starfield works. So I'd say it was a trolling comment.
Because I know you have your heart in Sony, as I do nintendo, I'd like to offer a comparative. I think the Uncharted Vita game is a disservice to the Uncharted games.
The ending is a 60 prompt qte fest. Yet the game looks, sounds, and runs well on Vita. So I'd probably give it a 6 despite me thinking it's a bad game.
regmcfly wrote:You got it the wrong way round my dude
poprock wrote:There’s no such thing as a ‘good’ corporation.
bad_hair_day wrote:Don’t rock the boat.poprock wrote:There’s no such thing as a ‘good’ corporation.
regmcfly wrote:You got it the wrong way round my dude
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!