Kow wrote:The fact that it turns into a discussion about how dangerous bears are and how women must de stupid to think they're safer with a bear etc is the reason it's not a great way to get the message across. Add that to Tik Tok, Twitter etc and the result is anger and entrenchment. Not the most useful result.
poprock wrote:Kow wrote:The fact that it turns into a discussion about how dangerous bears are and how women must de stupid to think they're safer with a bear etc is the reason it's not a great way to get the message across. Add that to Tik Tok, Twitter etc and the result is anger and entrenchment. Not the most useful result.
I agree that’s not the most useful result but I think It’s men who turn it into a discussion about how dangerous bears are etc. Not social media. Men.
It’s not, as Tin eloquently pointed out.Paul the sparky wrote:The question is about which is more dangerous.
Paul the sparky wrote:Go on then, enlighten me. What's the question about?
Moot_Geeza wrote:Paws for thought experiment.
RedDave2 wrote:The results are bearly credible and the typical polarising comments on social media reveal some grizzly thoughts from some people.Moot_Geeza wrote:Paws for thought experiment.
LivDiv wrote:RedDave2 wrote:The results are bearly credible and the typical polarising comments on social media reveal some grizzly thoughts from some people.Moot_Geeza wrote:Paws for thought experiment.
best not to panda to the clickbait.
Even if I was under some sort of obligation to respond to you being aggressive, yet again, I’m certainly under no obligation to conform with your timetable.Paul the sparky wrote:Hello?
Paul the sparky wrote:Here's Andy in pedant's corner again. Splitting hairs over perceived risk and danger as if they not part of the same thing when considering this question. Dear me. Surely you've done a risk assessment in your line of work?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!