afgavinstan wrote:One yes answer one troll, okay okay
beano wrote:Avoiding going to see this as with a lot of films shot round here the cinema will just be full of people going "that's that place" "no it's this other place" "etc"
monkey wrote:They showed the final scene in the film in the trailers. Admittedly it didn’t give away much but it’s bloody weird. They also showed the Riddler getting captured in the trailers. Which I thought, in order for them to trail it, would be like the Joker in the Dark Knight - early on in the film and not as it appears. But no it was the actual capture of the film’s primary antagonist in the final third of the story.ShabbyMcCrabby wrote:By the end of the movie you can see why Pattinson was interested in this version of the character. I think the film is less interested in him being Batman and more about the reasons why someone would wear a suit. It certainly didn't feel like a Batman movie to me in terms of what has come before. Did anyone else notice how much of the movie the trailer showed though. I tend to avoid trailers but watched the first teaser one and I think it showed nearly all of the actions sequences, multiple shots taken from the final 3rd and even the final 10 minutes. Also because of what it showed you could kind of see where certain things were going too. Pretty annoying really. Especially as it's a Batman film so people are gonna go see The Batman film regardless.Dark Soldier wrote:Question lads, not arsed bout spoilers. Is it actually a good 'film'? As in if you give absolutely zero fucks whatsoever about Batman or its universe, still worth a watch? Not going cinema but the 3 hour thing kinda puts me off for this genre. But I love Pattinson.
Rev wrote:I saw The Batman. There's a film that needed some kind of brevity in it. All the performances are excellent, right up to the point where they interact with each other and you feel everyone is concentrating on their own delivery that they forget to look up from their script. Pattinson has the potential to be an amazing Batman, but I don't need another gritty real life Debbie Downer right now. There's no relationship between Alfred and Bruce, in fact Serkis is on screen for about 20 minutes in total. I really missed Caine. Colin Farrell is outstanding and deserves his kudos. There's no real reason for the big thing at the end to happen, it's a threat for threats sake. It seems like it's there to set up film two. There's too many bits with Batman walking really slowly. There's too many scenes that seem to stall the pace. In fact it could have done with losing half an hour. It should have had that surprise cut scene in it. Unlike the Marvel films where you walk out feeling entertained, I walked out of this feeling like I needed a palate cleanser. I'm not disappointed but it's going to be a long time before I watch this again.
Bob wrote:Well imagine doing another origin story? At this point no one doesn’t know … I think it does a great job of Including non bat fans
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!