Probably not. 50+1 rule and much stricter (or actually enforced) limitations on spending as a sustainable proportion of income. Then if the fans want to sell the acquirable stake to US MegaSports Inc, that's on them. They wouldn't be able to inject huge sums of money into the club, skewing competition. But they might be better placed to exploit global merchandising or whatever.Funkstain wrote:does this include US-led business consortia? asking for a friendmonkey wrote:Send them back.
Funkstain wrote:Depressingly true at least in short / medium term I’m not sure the city talk is overblown though. The tweet about how much city would’ve won the league by over last 6 seasons or whatever was sobering. Has any team been that dominant over third place and the rest during pl era?
afgavinstan wrote:Personally think Man City should be given a six point deduction. Not for the pitch invasion, but for this
Or at least phone child services, Bernardos, something please. Fuck me.
thank goodness for City in 19/20 otherwise Liverpool would have made a right mockery of the league?Paul the sparky wrote:I'd say the evidence is conclusive of something
JonB wrote:You could also put the current situation down to two teams really having their shit together, versus other teams not having their shit together. Man U, Spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea could be pushing City and Liverpool much closer with the right managers, recruitment, philosophy, or whatever in place, but they haven't been able to get it right for one reason or another. It's not just that the top 2 are steaming ahead, it's that the rest have fallen behind.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!