Liveinadive wrote:There was a 2% difference between Lab and Con at the last GE in my current constituency. I'm not going to risk a Tory seat on that tight a margin by voting for anyone but Labour.
Especially as it was a leave Tory that won.
monkey wrote:I'm in a Labour / Tory marginal as well, currently held by Labour. Problem is the Labour MP is Queen of Brexit, Gisela Stuart. So what are the options here? Endorsing one mad Brexit twat over another? After the referendum, I decided anyome who endorsed the process was disqualified from getting my vote. I'll use my vote to signal opposition to Brexit which is, imo, a better use of it than getting mad twat Gisela Stuart back into Parliament.Liveinadive wrote:There was a 2% difference between Lab and Con at the last GE in my current constituency. I'm not going to risk a Tory seat on that tight a margin by voting for anyone but Labour. Especially as it was a leave Tory that won.
monkey wrote:I think Corbyn / Labour might do slightly better than expected if he can get his act together for a couple of months and people actually hear some of his policies straight from his mouth. Granted, 'better than expected' is a low bar for him as most people are expecting electoral apocalypse.
Diluted Dante wrote:Labour are still trusted far more on the NHS than the Tories
monkey wrote:I'm in a Labour / Tory marginal as well, currently held by Labour. Problem is the Labour MP is Queen of Brexit, Gisela Stuart. So what are the options here? Endorsing one mad Brexit twat over another? After the referendum, I decided anyome who endorsed the process was disqualified from getting my vote. I'll use my vote to signal opposition to Brexit which is, imo, a better use of it than getting mad twat Gisela Stuart back into Parliament.
Escape wrote:
Corbyn's replacement'll be May Zero. His best bet in my view is to focus on sabre-rattling as a pacifist. Support for Trident might grow rapidly under May's incompetence if Tiny Hands goes full turnip.
I'd vote for someone who vows to keep us out of that unless anyone attacks us directly.
GooberTheHat wrote:
Going anti nuke will never win you more votes than you lose. Corbyn won't go hard on the things that people will actually care about. NHS, corporate tax breaks/corporate welfare, schools. He will witter on about ensuring a "good" brexit, which no one will trust him to do because only Tories can negotiate hard, and he will be as irrelevant as ever.
Liveinadive wrote:A big problem seems to be that the left wing parties will not work together in a coalition.
There is no way any of them could get a majority but there is a slim hope we repeat the 2010 election. In which case a SNP/Labour/Lib Dem/Green coalition could force out the Tories who are only likely to get Ukip on side.
mistercrayon wrote:Post election anything is in the game (who would have predicted a lib dem Tory coalition).
Diluted Dante wrote:GooberTheHat wrote:
Going anti nuke will never win you more votes than you lose. Corbyn won't go hard on the things that people will actually care about. NHS, corporate tax breaks/corporate welfare, schools. He will witter on about ensuring a "good" brexit, which no one will trust him to do because only Tories can negotiate hard, and he will be as irrelevant as ever.
So you think he's going to ignore all the policies he's just announced?
But not doing something pre election is gifting seats to the Tories.mistercrayon wrote:In pre election the parties are right to fight Imo It is a democracy of ideas after all and withdrawing one set of ideas in order to "win" is somewhat gross. The slippery slope to this is terrifying. Of course by that same token if voters happen to gravitate towards a certain strategy then that is their prerogative at least but removing choice at the first hurdle is bad.
Post election anything is in the game (who would have predicted a lib dem Tory coalition).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!