davyK wrote:Raiziel wrote:Not a remake but a prequel. It’s not patch on Carpenter’s, but I really quite enjoyed it.davyK wrote:The Thing is brilliant. I assume we are talking about the Carpenter version with Kurt Russell? There was a remake but I have no idea what it's like.
Didn't know it was a prequel - thought it was one those redundant remakes. Will give that a watch when I get a chance.
RedDave2 wrote:Don't think you could pay me to sit through any of the hobbit trilogy again. Being bad is one thing. But 3 plus hours of bad? Fuck that
yourfavouriteuncle wrote:RedDave2 wrote:Don't think you could pay me to sit through any of the hobbit trilogy again. Being bad is one thing. But 3 plus hours of bad? Fuck that
I feel the same about LotR films too tbh. Trash tier passion projects - the lot of em. Never got the love.
RedDave2 wrote:I'm more fogiving but I don't think they have aged as well as something like star wars or Indy. Simply put they are far too bloated for no real reason.yourfavouriteuncle wrote:I feel the same about LotR films too tbh. Trash tier passion projects - the lot of em. Never got the love.RedDave2 wrote:Don't think you could pay me to sit through any of the hobbit trilogy again. Being bad is one thing. But 3 plus hours of bad? Fuck that
davyK wrote:I still like the LoTR extended editions. I have the Hobbit extended editions too - a result of me being hit with completist-mania but I can't remember much about them. There are extra fighting scenes with the dwarves in the 5 armies battle which are a bit of fun but that's it.
I've upgraded the LoTR to BluRay but I doubt I'll do the same with The Hobbit. Martin Freeman really is rather good in it though.
A Del Toro 2 parter would really have been worth doing
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!