GooberTheHat wrote:Voter suppression and targeted influence to dissuade are not the same thing imo.
mistercrayon wrote:If anyone doesn’t go out to vote because of Facebook. Man.
Was some of the microtargeted not "fake news"? Maybe people would argue that's subjective... don't really know. But yeah it's bullshit basically.Armitage_Shankburn wrote:GooberTheHat wrote:Voter suppression and targeted influence to dissuade are not the same thing imo.
Voter suppression includes:
Challenging registration spuriously
Disseminating fake news and tactics to deter
Arguably, criminalising great big sections of the community so they're disenfranchised.
It does not include political advertising to make them think, fuck it I won't bother.
I agree that microadvertising using data as a better targeting tool (not the same as big data) is making a previously lawful but arguably immoral tactic more effective. But the US has been dirty AF forever, this is not new, it's using new tools to do old dirt.
Funkstain wrote:FT in centrism rational choice calm down politics as usual shocker
If by live with, the guy meant that everyone hates Biden equally then sure, don’t see how that heals the rifts
Yeah, fine. But that's a different point. It's not 'the best thing for America at the moment', it's the the only choice against a worse one.monkey wrote:The choice is Biden or Trump. Piss poor options but there you go. No contest. Either fix nothing or destroy everything.
JonB wrote:It's not 'the best thing for America at the moment', it's the the only choice against a worse one.
‘Best thing’ was my words that I dashed out not anticipating the reaction.JonB wrote:Yeah, fine. But that's a different point. It's not 'the best thing for America at the moment', it's the the only choice against a worse one.monkey wrote:The choice is Biden or Trump. Piss poor options but there you go. No contest. Either fix nothing or destroy everything.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!