Yossarian wrote:Many alt-righters describe themselves as ‘classical liberals’ though. The phrase is in Paul Joseph Watson’s Twitter bio. I don’t think that the two groups are that easily separated.
Carol Anderson: The real radical is the man who hits power in high places
It was the 1920s. A morally and sexually compromised president had come to power promising a regime fundamentally different to his predecessor’s. The new administration was packed with conmen, hucksters, and unqualified shills raiding the public treasury and selling public lands to Big Oil. There were also those in the cabinet with an agenda that would place inordinate, unbridled power in the hands of corporations while millions of poor Americans took the brunt of a Great Depression that hit before anyone knew what to call it.
Greed fever ran like an epidemic in the financial sector giving the illusion of prosperity and wealth when, just underneath, the economy had major fissures and faultlines that threatened to topple the American behemoth. Meanwhile, black people were being terrorised in Tulsa, the Ku Klux Klan was gaining political power in key states in the north, voting rights were under attack, and a new racist immigration law effectively shut the door on anyone not Anglo-Saxon.
The international scene was just as vexing. The rise of fascist regimes in Europe and Japan ran headlong into an American retreat from the League of Nations, and by the 1930s there was a growing internal fifth column, marketing itself as “America First”, that undermined any effective response to regimes that threatened US national security.
In the midst of the maelstrom, an intellectual brawl broke out among African Americans. Unbelievably, the real issue was not the political and economic horror that confronted the nation and black people, who were dealing with massive disparities in access to constitutional rights and wealth. Instead, one African American intellectual openly and mercilessly challenged another over what was essentially ephemera. Du Bois looked on at the row within Fisk University, Tennessee, and shook his head. This peacock display was merely the effervescence of faux bravery. “The real radical,” he noted, “is the man, who hits power in high places, white power, power backed by unlimited wealth; hits it and hits it openly and between the eyes.”
It’s 2017. A morally and sexually compromised man has assumed the presidency of the United States. His regime is attacking black and brown people with reckless abandon while, under the guise of “America first”, shielding Nazis and other white supremacists, and providing no defence against a government that threatens US national security. He and his minions have also unleashed wanton corporate greed, reduced public lands, attacked voting rights, and imposed or threatened immigration restrictions to warm the cockles of any eugenicist.
In the midst of this maelstrom …
Yossarian wrote:Apparently at work we are contributing to the death of the white race by illustrating articles on dating with mixed-race couples.
I decided against replying to that email.
Yossarian wrote:Apparently at work we are contributing to the death of the white race by illustrating articles on dating with mixed-race couples.
Pretty much. They can't get enough of it. Look at any of the comments sections.yourfavouriteuncle wrote:Why would somebody with those views ever be anywhere near the The Guardian? I mean do they go actively searching for fair minded shit to get all uppity about?
Facewon wrote:Re "just" do you mean the "just 65%" sentence? Because that stuck out to me. That's a big % to be using just for.
JRPC wrote:Taking a pause to think about how best to proceed.
Facewon wrote:Knock me over with a feather. That Coleman Hughes chap is on a Sam Harris pod.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!