g.man wrote:I was under the impression that it is actually four episodes? Is that not how it's being shown over here?
poprock wrote:I confidently predict that this will still be a turd though.
MattyJ wrote:Nah, there are plenty of cases where a directors cut of a movie is far superior to a studio cut. Editing can make or break a film
g.man wrote:Pfffft. The best version of Bladerunner is the original with the voiceover.
have they shot new material for this? i was under the impression it was a bit more than just re edit and restore some cut scenes from the original, which is the traditional 'directors cut' thing.MattyJ wrote:Nah, there are plenty of cases where a directors cut of a movie is far superior to a studio cut. Editing can make or break a film
RamSteelwood wrote:have they shot new material for this? i was under the impression it was a bit more than just re edit and restore some cut scenes from the original, which is the traditional 'directors cut' thing.MattyJ wrote:Nah, there are plenty of cases where a directors cut of a movie is far superior to a studio cut. Editing can make or break a film
I don't think this is actually true.MattyJ wrote:They've shot a bunch yeah, was more trying to say that sometimes a turd is because of editing or whathaveyou and can be addressed
His daughter died so he left the project.RamSteelwood wrote:interesting stuff G. so what we've got is Snyder re-cutting and re-editing a longer version of Whedon's recut, re-edited and slightly reshot version of a film Snyder initially started making but was released from because it wasn't going well?
g.man wrote:Pfffft. The best version of Bladerunner is the original with the voiceover.
regmcfly wrote:March, actually
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!