Absolutely. All I think we can safely say is that he's financially fine, but could have been making more.Kow wrote:Either way he's not short of a few quid. I'm not sure the rights for music are the same as getting royalties. No idea what the rights to a song allow you to do with it. And there's a whole thing of band royalties and songwriter royalties, sales royalties and airplay royalties etc. Can of worms is right.
He sold his rights, but retained creative control, so he could still veto what was done with the catalogue.Kow wrote:I've just been trawling around for information and nobody seems to know anything about it. Interestingly in 2019, Plant granted a director permission to use two Zeppelin songs in an indie film, free of charge it seems (otherwise it would have cost approximately 3 million dollars!). How would he do that if he no longer had the rights?
I have never heard a Korn song in my life. Band that completely passed me by. I don't lose any sleep tbh.afgavinstan wrote:Yeah I'm watching Limp Bizkit w/koRn supporting before I see any of them, the stones, or the who. Have a good day, folks.
g.man wrote:I have never heard a Korn song in my life. Band that completely passed me by. I don't lose any sleep tbh.afgavinstan wrote:Yeah I'm watching Limp Bizkit w/koRn supporting before I see any of them, the stones, or the who. Have a good day, folks.
g.man wrote:I remember buying that Limp Bizkit album out of curiosity at the time. Wasn't my bag.
g.man wrote:He got that from me.
Facewon wrote:Gav gets a massive pass for being young.
Anyone else mentioning bizkit in the same sentence as those legacy acts can do one.
Also, Queen and inxs laugh at you all suggesting there's things you can't do with your band.
You can do anything. It's just that some things are a very very bad idea.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!