Let me stop you right there.superflyninja wrote:...And so I have been listening to a bit of ol Ben Shapiro ...
For reference superfly: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_GallopTempy wrote:...and be gish galloping morons....
No.superflyninja wrote:Do you think are Ben Shapiro and Tim Pool correct that RussiaGate was an illegal investigation by the democrats that resulted in no evidence against Trump?
They can never be blindly trusted and never should have been. Nothing has changed. Use your standard-issue bullshit detector.superflyninja wrote:Can the mainstream media and the likes of Facebook and Twitter be trusted anymore?
Yes, his is really that bad.superflyninja wrote:Also, the democrats clearly have pulled out all the stops to get Trump out and have been desperate to get Trump out. Is he really that bad?
Ah, here’s the rub. You think there’s some secret reason ‘they’ (who are ‘they’, by the way, in this context?) want rid of Trump. Because a conspiracy would make more sense than basic human decency. Wanting to democratically oust a dangerous, unstable narcissist from the highest position of power in the world isn’t enough?superflyninja wrote:Or is there another reason they want him out?
No of course never blindy trust media, its just a question of how much trust (if any) to put in them.poprock wrote:No.Do you think are Ben Shapiro and Tim Pool correct that RussiaGate was an illegal investigation by the democrats that resulted in no evidence against Trump?They can never be blindly trusted and never should have been. Nothing has changed. Use your standard-issue bullshit detector.Can the mainstream media and the likes of Facebook and Twitter be trusted anymore?Yes, his is really that bad.Also, the democrats clearly have pulled out all the stops to get Trump out and have been desperate to get Trump out. Is he really that bad?Ah, here’s the rub. You think there’s some secret reason ‘they’ (who are ‘they’, by the way, in this context?) want rid of Trump. Because a conspiracy would make more sense than basic human decency. Wanting to democratically oust a dangerous, unstable narcissist from the highest position of power in the world isn’t enough? Okay. I suggest that you stop dancing around it and share your conspiracy theory with us.Or is there another reason they want him out?
Dickhead.Tempy wrote:I didn’t say they were people who believed in lizard people, I said they were grifters with very little credibility. I think you can find a lot of evidence for that without needing any hand holding. Jones is a grifter. Regardless of what he believes in he’s a guy who has identified a market and is milking it dry by sticking to a rhetoric that gets him paid. The always amusing anecdote about Shapiro is that he once suggested that land loss due to global warming was not an issue because the people losing their costal properties to flooding could simply sell them. To who? Edit: When I am not working I might find some of the many videos that analyse stuff that Shapiro and Pool have done. The main one that comes to mind with Pool is when he went to one of those Swedish “no go” zones and breathless went on about how dangerous and scary it was, but the second anyone did any serious analysis of it all it just fell apart like everything else these grifters do. They have a conclusion they want to portray and they’ll do and say anything to contort their arguments to support it and obfuscate the facts.
superflyninja wrote:Good day fellow curious gentlemen.
Ill need to word this carefully. But what are we making of the mainstream media in the US of A these days?
Id like to say that I dont lean in any particular direction politically, Biden and Trump are just two old men. One with the skintone of that bloke from the Tangerine ad. I would also like to add that I have some unique experience of being in possession of facts that were suppressed and are still being suppressed and ignored to this day. Ive seen first hand, people refusing to read evidence that was presented in court (the case was won), instead preferring to accept the word of the opposition because it meant they could stick their heads in the sand and carry on. It amazed me at the time that such evidence and articles appearing in national newspapers backing us up were just ignored.
And so I have been listening to a bit of ol Ben Shapiro and Tim Pool lately due to a dearth of interesting podcasts. (Though Mysterious Universe is awesome as always)
Now neither of these blokes (especially Ben "I hate the WAP" Shapiro) strike me as particularly conspiratorial but what they have been calling out in the media is rather....interesting and reminiscent of the case I mentioned earlier. Correct me if Im wrong but Biden's son's laptop,( according to the likes of Shapiro at least) the information has been verified as being authentic yet the mainstream media refuse to ask serious questions about it. Had the laptop been released by Biden against Trump I think its pretty obvious how the media would have reacted.
Considering the general atmosphere out there, I would again like to clarify that Im not pro Trump, Im not anti-Trump either, Ive not read up enough about him to form an opinion. But what I am curious about is the apparent easy ride the democrats are getting in the media. For example that Glenn Greenwald fella resigning from his own website when it censored him ( I think he wrote about the Biden laptop).
Im sure many of you guys are much better informed than I am. Do you think are Ben Shapiro and Tim Pool correct that RussiaGate was an illegal investigation by the democrats that resulted in no evidence against Trump? Can the mainstream media and the likes of Facebook and Twitter be trusted anymore?
Also, the democrats clearly have pulled out all the stops to get Trump out and have been desperate to get Trump out. Is he really that bad? Or is there another reason they want him out?
Im asking here because Im sure if I even ask this in the politics thread Ill get labelled a moronic, alt right fascist, women-hating nazi racist
Ive not worded this quite right...I dont have time. I may later.
yep that lizard people thing was meant in lighthearted..ness.Tempy wrote:I didn’t say they were people who believed in lizard people, I said they were grifters with very little credibility. I think you can find a lot of evidence for that without needing any hand holding. Jones is a grifter. Regardless of what he believes in he’s a guy who has identified a market and is milking it dry by sticking to a rhetoric that gets him paid. The always amusing anecdote about Shapiro is that he once suggested that land loss due to global warming was not an issue because the people losing their costal properties to flooding could simply sell them. To who? Edit: When I am not working I might find some of the many videos that analyse stuff that Shapiro and Pool have done. The main one that comes to mind with Pool is when he went to one of those Swedish “no go” zones and breathless went on about how dangerous and scary it was, but the second anyone did any serious analysis of it all it just fell apart like everything else these grifters do. They have a conclusion they want to portray and they’ll do and say anything to contort their arguments to support it and obfuscate the facts.
Diluted Dante wrote:With Hunter Biden, there are enough holes in the laptop story that we could market it as a new English cheese, but regardless, the most it could manage is to make Hunter Biden look Dodgy, and didn't tie anything to Joe.
dynamiteReady wrote:Wait. I'm basing my doubt in Biden on this article - https://greenwald.substack.com/p/article-on-joe-and-hunter-biden-censored Though, I'm not unhappy that he's won. But why exactly do you consider the Hunter Biden story to be insubstantial? I'd like all public officials held up to a certain moral standard. Not just the ones I hate.Diluted Dante wrote:With Hunter Biden, there are enough holes in the laptop story that we could market it as a new English cheese, but regardless, the most it could manage is to make Hunter Biden look Dodgy, and didn't tie anything to Joe.
MattyJ wrote:I rarely post in this thread or about stuff like this because there are way more intelligent people than me on here who can argue better. But! Reading through some of that guys article and the emails he published, it's clear his editors wouldn't publish the article because all the stuff he wrote about hunter Biden had no basis in fact at all and he could provide none. So why even give it the time of day?
Diluted Dante wrote:The laptop is held by Rudy Guilliani, which should be a huge red flag for anyone, and he won't allow people to properly verify the contents.
GooberTheHat wrote:You've just incentivised politicians to lie to you about their opponent dyna.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!