WorKid wrote:There was an account daily tweeting WW2 as if live. Done now. @realtimeww2
JRPC wrote:You’re all far too easily impressed.
All Gonz demonstrates there is a failure to understand someone expressing themselves clearly.
Gonz, the fact you describe the intentions that Harris attributes to Israel as being ‘benevolent’, or that he bases those of the Palestinians simply on the ‘utterances of a weak and angry party’ shows that you’re simply not paying attention. These are such gross misrepresentations of what’s actually being said that everything you write subsequently should be ignored.
Harris’ position is actually much the same as Richard Dawkins (and Daniel Dennet’s for what it’s worth):
1. That this is a terrible conflict with plenty of culpability on both sides. That there's more than enough blood for all hands involved, but nevertheless the Israelis can absolutely take a relative moral high-ground based on the specific actions and stated intentions of both sides.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!