monkey wrote:If anyone had said anything like that, you might have a point.
poprock wrote:One thing I was thinking about: There isn’t time for a second referendum now. How long does a referendum take, start to finish? There seems to be an accepted period of time for campaigning and I seem to remember it’s longer than six months.
You asked how it could go wrong. I said ways it could. I also later said this.Andy wrote:It’s pretty much exactly what you both said, in a nutshell.monkey wrote:If anyone had said anything like that, you might have a point.
You said my position was lazy / cowardly and was equivalent to this.monkey wrote:I want whatever cancels Brexit so I think it’s worth a try.
Andy wrote:“We’d best not try to stop it, because that seems awkward.”
I wouldn't joke about it if I were you. Guardian HQ is going to be one of the first stops on the lynch mob's itinerary.Yossarian wrote:Ironically, most Leave voters are probably all for bringing back hanging.
monkey wrote:You asked how it could go wrong.
Yossarian wrote:Labour winning anyone over is irrelevant to avoiding Brexit.
Yossarian wrote:For me, Labour are almost as culpable for the current situation as the Tories are owing to their failure to act as an opposition on this issue.
Apparently, the line about Remain being on the table in a 2nd ref, that got him a minute long standing ovation, was stuck in after the speech had been approved by the leadership. They didn't know he was going to say it.Unlikely wrote:Starmer's fairly made some waves today. Good for him.
equinox_code wrote:Yossarian wrote:Labour winning anyone over is irrelevant to avoiding Brexit.Yossarian wrote:For me, Labour are almost as culpable for the current situation as the Tories are owing to their failure to act as an opposition on this issue.
Which of these two consecutive and contradictory statements are you going with?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!