Minnesänger wrote:I mean, Warren voters who don't get Warren will almost certainly get behind Harris or Sanders. But Sanders voters who don't get Sanders...
Plus, Sanders actually has rust belt support and the track-record. If it goes all the way, he'll pick up Trump strongholds that I don't think the other two will.
Trump’s trade policy is polling under water in the rust belt. Anyone but Trump is in with a decent shot around there.
Brooks wrote:Harris is a damn cop. Bernie or bust.
Yossarian wrote:FWIW, right now I’d pick Warren over Sanders, or indeed anyone else. She’s been nailing it, IMO. As a bonus, she’s not older than the sun.
RedDave2 wrote:This is really matter that much about who goes in beyond them being able to get the votes to become president.? They can all talk policy but sanders would have to temper his plans a little even if he won, otherwise the dems won't support him.
I don't know enough about the individuals but for me sanders, Harris and Warren were the most appealing in terms of charisma and like it or not that's as important as any policy.
Yossarian wrote:FWIW, right now I’d pick Warren over Sanders, or indeed anyone else. She’s been nailing it, IMO. As a bonus, she’s not older than the sun.
That makes sense, but people must have said that to him already. He'll be thinking it's his turn and he has the Democrat machine behind him.Diluted Dante wrote:She's 70. Biden won't win. I think at some point he'll be advised hes too toxic and be asked to back out. He will probably stay in a while, but his numbers are only going to go down.Yossarian wrote:FWIW, right now I’d pick Warren over Sanders, or indeed anyone else. She’s been nailing it, IMO. As a bonus, she’s not older than the sun.
Brooks wrote:Which one?
When Hamas puts its rocket launchers next to hospitals, next to schools, they’re using their civilian population to protect their military assets...
And I believe Israel has a right, at that point, to defend itself.
ozno wrote:Warren is unarguably a vast improvement over trump, she will make some minor improvements to the economic system such that fewer people will be miserable, summat like 10% fewer people will be miserable under her presidency than trump's. She will probably take some steps to reduce the rate at which we are turning our planet into Venus, maybe even by about 20%. She is undoubtedly the third best dem candidate, behind Bernie and Tulsi Gabbard. She may have a decent 8 years and pave the way for Ocario Cortez or someone who does understand what we urgently need, and by that time who knows maybe there is still time for us all
Yossarian wrote:I won’t argue with you because I don’t want to argue with someone who sees attacks as part and parcel of arguing. I’ve got to look after my mental health, I can’t do that in the face of abuse. Sorry man, I just can’t do it.
I_R wrote:That makes sense, but people must have said that to him already. He'll be thinking it's his turn and he has the Democrat machine behind him.Diluted Dante wrote:Biden won't win. I think at some point he'll be advised hes too toxic and be asked to back out. He will probably stay in a while, but his numbers are only going to go down.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!