The Daddy wrote:Kow wrote:I really enjoyed it at the cinema but I haven't been able to sit through a second viewing for some reason.
Same, keep dipping into it for 20mins or so but it doesn't really lend itself well to that. Just not been in the mood for a full watch.
Paul the sparky wrote:All new music, Vangelis not even involved in 2049. The original theme obviously comes in at one point.
Bob wrote:Paul the sparky wrote:All new music, Vangelis not even involved in 2049. The original theme obviously comes in at one point.
Then it also perfectly captures the mood good sequel considering new lead new director and new score
g.man wrote:I watched Casino Royale on the tellybox tonight. Haven't seen it before.
I guess back when it came out in 2006 it was seen as a sort of edgy reboot of the Bond franchise, but fuck me it's a hot mess. Terrible stuff even by Bond standards. I gather the next one is meant to be even worse, so that must be quite something.
Couldn't agree more. Not doing that was a real missed opportunity when they rebooted the franchise with Craig.LivDiv wrote:I honestly think the best thing they can do is move Bond to a period setting. Too many other movies are doing the modern action spy thing better.
hylian_elf wrote:Solace was terrible. I actually like Casino Royale.
Oh God! I've seen that! Must have blanked it from my memory. Christ, what a stinking turd of a film that was.GooberTheHat wrote:Is quantum of solice the one with the random hotel in the desert at the end? That one was shit. I liked Javier Bardem in the other one, but the story was a contrived mess.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!