That's pretty much a semantically empty phrase - rundown the list of characteristics for if it's "woo" or not: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/WooDinostar77 wrote:" in the nexus between consciousness and quantum mechanics".
Well, the consciousness of the experiencer is often a primary factor in *all* reports of anything - it's why we discount testimony from known liars, people with psychosis or someone who was on drugs at the time etc.Dinostar77 wrote:If you discount the uap stuff that is usa made secret planes/drones or back engineered whatever etc. Then most of the people who spend their time looking at this stuff for a living seem to come to the same conclusion, consciousness is somehow involved in the phenomena but no-one is sure how or why.
djchump wrote:Why would the Pentagon spend any time commenting on UFO videos for the general public? I'm sure they've got much more important things to do.
Dinostar77 wrote:Well the navy responded to this guy even if the pentagon didn't. In regards the three videos that were released. *Source interview belongs to the work of Roger Glassel. Follow-Up Query – Responses 16 September 2019 1... .
Not true, as stated in both (A6) and (A8) in Dino's linked text (which we are currently *presuming* is from a Navy representative). They may have an explanation, they just aren't telling you, and aren't going to tell you.bad_hair_day wrote:Quite, but they did officially release those after investigation and still found them to be unexplained.Why would the Pentagon spend any time commenting on UFO videos for the general public? I'm sure they've got much more important things to do.
Armitage_Shankburn wrote:Dino is my source. If I see Dino, I see another four letter word.Spoiler:
That really should be a red flag for someone who has motivated reasoning. There's an entire industry dependent around unexplained things remaining mysterious and unexplained, so that there are still things for them to investigate and ways to sell books, seminars and reap ad revenue from websites.Dinostar77 wrote:... most of the people who spend their time looking at this stuff for a living seem to come to ....
djchump wrote:Not true, as stated in both (A6) and (A8) in Dino's linked text (which we are currently *presuming* is from a Navy representative). They may have an explanation, they just aren't telling you, and aren't going to tell you.bad_hair_day wrote:Quite, but they did officially release those after investigation and still found them to be unexplained.Why would the Pentagon spend any time commenting on UFO videos for the general public? I'm sure they've got much more important things to do.
bad_hair_day wrote:let's not spit hairs
This does wind me up a bit I must admit. There are officially released statements and videos etc. At the very least the reasoning behind making these public is intriguing.bad_hair_day wrote:The reality is: There are hypersonic objects which have been tracked, video captured and eye witnessed by elite pilots. People can deny this all day long if it makes them feel uncomfortable.
Skerret wrote:The phenomenon of the bulk of an online community trying and failing for years to sway a conspiracy theory adherent back to reality is the true mystery here
... other than that some of the examples aren’t actually hypersonic.bad_hair_day wrote:The reality is: There are hypersonic objects which have been tracked, video captured and eye witnessed by elite pilots. People can deny this all day long if it makes them feel uncomfortable.
And that's the problem, there's just some things that you either can't know, or can't know right now.bad_hair_day wrote:... Edit: DJ, I don't want to believe, I just want to know.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!