fullspectrum wrote:nope
adkm1979 wrote:The reason being, and this is where the controversial idea comes along, in this day of photoshop and photorealistic graphics, would it not be an idea to legally make available pornography which is artificially generated but portrays what the viewer wants. Would allowing paedophiles to view pornographic material of fictitious, apparently underage children prevent real children from being photographed and abused, and how would society feel about it?
Carbon_Altered wrote:When was music best? When was the best football/tennis/rugby played? When were the best films made? When was porn best / most innocent / least depraved? If your answer is "when I was a teenager" then you're like pretty much every adult that constantly harks back to when things were better, that just so happened to coincide with their youth.
Not necessarily the case.LazyGunn wrote:Ashamed to be a man? Never, being able to intelligently have sexual relations with somone without exploiting them is your choice, and down to your wisdom, if you get it wrong then ufortunately you have to pay the price, as do the folk you used
Skerret wrote:The site from the people wot made the sexism video I posted in the misogyny thread. We're terrible! I disown me.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!