Time_on_my_hands wrote:ChopperByrne wrote:
They at least tried to explain away Starfleet not using transwarp because Scotty sabotaged it on the Excelsior making it look like a failure.
Which also makes no sense because it indicates that they never did any analysis on the Excelsior's failure - Scotty's sabotage was just to rip out a few components, so you'd think that it would be obvious.
Time_on_my_hands wrote:The whole thing about a saga being crushed by the weight of continuity is why for a long running franchise I prefer the James Bond or Mad Max method, whereby there are thematic links stitched together by heresay and unreliable storytelling. Star Trek can't function lke LotR because it's being reinvented all the time. It's already killing the MCU and Star Wars.
ChopperByrne wrote:Which is why they should have just set shows after Voyager. They already know what's established, and can invent any new shite they want.
mannaboy wrote:Ere are you still watching Discovery? Couldn’t get through more than ten minutes of episode two. Jumped forward to episode ten (ten forward ha) and turned off pretty quickly, just hate the future setting and still prevalent emoting go on with the crew.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!