Unlikely wrote:You Were Never Really Here.
monkey wrote:Djornsons daughter is right and could easily take you. P1 > P2.
mistercrayon wrote:Inherent Vice is one of my stealth favourite films of all time. I always forget about it and then when someone mentions it I’m like: yo this film was pretty damn good at doing what it was trying to do (woozy wooz wooz wooz)
ShabbyMcCrabby wrote:Considering the quality of both films I guessing that > is so slight it may as well be a |Djornsons daughter is right and could easily take you. P1 > P2.
Moot_Geeza wrote:mistercrayon wrote:Inherent Vice is one of my stealth favourite films of all time. I always forget about it and then when someone mentions it I’m like: yo this film was pretty damn good at doing what it was trying to do (woozy wooz wooz wooz)
I had to read the book before I could appreciate the film. Was a lot better on second viewing.
Andy wrote:ShabbyMcCrabby wrote:Considering the quality of both films I guessing that > is so slight it may as well be a |Djornsons daughter is right and could easily take you. P1 > P2.
What’s |? I would’ve thought ⩾, ~, or ≮ would work...
g.man wrote:I sit firmly in the hated it camp. Thought it was really terrible, and I'm not convinced Ramsay could direct traffic, let alone a film.b0r1s wrote:Well this isn’t a good film imo. Anyway interesting mix of reviews online show that it is certainly dividing people. Some saying it’s her best work yet others that their talents are wasted on this film. I’m obviously in the latter camp.
poprock wrote:I’m at the Glasgow Film Festival launch party. I don’t know any of these people.
afgavinstan wrote:https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/bryan-singers-accusers-speak-out/580462/ After seeing An Open Secret, I've waited for this moment to come. Vile person.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!