MattyJ wrote:What's all this about a labour mp and JK Rowling?
LivDiv wrote:MattyJ wrote:What's all this about a labour mp and JK Rowling?
In as brief an explanation as possible.
In the trans rights debate there are a lot of people who counter it with women's right particularly in regards to women only safe spaces (public toilets mainly).
JK Rowling is one of those people. She has gone in quite hard over the years and recently felt the need to give context by explaining how she was sexually assaulted.
Labour MP accused her of using her sexual assault to get out of some pretty hard flak she was recieving.
Funkstain wrote:£1B doesn't sound like a lot to me But then I am very privileged
This is already happening re: schools and the state giving them money to spend on tuition. That will all end up in the Boys' pockets.Funkstain wrote:£1B doesn't sound like a lot to me
But then I am very privileged
Also as Liv points out, surely no-one has any doubt that this state money will be used to subsidise "favourite" private companies to "re-imagine" the state?
SpaceGazelle wrote:Good to see that Boris is going to spend his way out of trouble. If this were Cameron we'd all be royally screwed, the austerity/Brexit fuckwit.
Spending after the war worked and it'll work again as long as it's seen through. Sadly, only the Tories could make this plan and get it approved by the public, most of whom genuinely still equate Labour with Eastern block poverty. It's alright if the posh ones do it but if Corbyn had the same plan, which he did, he'd be shown the door, which he was.
SpaceGazelle wrote:£1B is peanuts. I think that's just a minor schools thing. A green revolution is the thing. It might cost 1T to get it done right but it's really the only option.Funkstain wrote:£1B doesn't sound like a lot to me But then I am very privileged
SpaceGazelle wrote:What a cop out. Turns out his spending plans are actually tiny, too reliant on the private sector and seemingly without any real structural and social change. This was the moment and he's blown it, the tit.
Diluted Dante wrote:
monkey wrote:If you think new build houses are low quality with the existing red tape just wait until you step inside one in a couple of years. A Boris box.
monkey wrote:If you think new build houses are low quality with the existing red tape just wait until you step inside one in a couple of years.
A Boris box.
Paul the sparky wrote:They can save even more money and the environment by using the recycled cladding taken off all those high rise multis post Grenfell.monkey wrote:If you think new build houses are low quality with the existing red tape just wait until you step inside one in a couple of years. A Boris box.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!