Diluted Dante wrote:Joshua is a much better boxer than Wilder. He might not have that punch, but I'd back him over 12 rounds.
afgavinstan wrote:Fury v AJ will be nuts. A proper boxing contest.
Eric wrote:With you there. Wilder is totally one dimensional no doubt, but is where he is because his corner has picked his fights much like Joshua's team has.
Based on that performance I don't think Joshua will have much of a say in stopping Fury.
Armitage_Shankburn wrote:Fury is 31 year old
SpaceGazelle wrote:I didn't realise Wilder has first dibs on a rematch. That's exactly the stupid kind of idea promoters get in their heads when they have one good title fight. He'd be silly to take it and seems sensible enough so presumably not. £20M is plenty already so he should hang up his gloves.
Joshua is going to get mauled if he takes it on, which he should by rights. Never fight a mental 40yr old gypsy. If I were Joshua I wouldn't even fight Fury's Dad.
nick_md wrote:I'm not particularly proud of my viewing habits, ftr.
mistercrayon wrote:Er. It’s a normal clause when a champion fights a challenger. To take into account the lucky punch etc. Joshua wouldn’t be champion withiout itI didn't realise Wilder has first dibs on a rematch. That's exactly the stupid kind of idea promoters get in their heads when they have one good title fight. He'd be silly to take it and seems sensible enough so presumably not. £20M is plenty already so he should hang up his gloves. Joshua is going to get mauled if he takes it on, which he should by rights. Never fight a mental 40yr old gypsy. If I were Joshua I wouldn't even fight Fury's Dad.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!