Tempy wrote:Interesting cos of how mad our brains are, rather than there being some weird alternate timeline ripped open by CERN
Kow wrote:It is all very interesting, but it's important to put all rational explanations first before you go actually believing any of it. Any phenomenon that can be easily discounted should be. Doesn't make it any less interesting.
Minkymu wrote:The film had richard gere in ot. Twas ok
Minkymu wrote:Talking about brains being weird, do you know if you put the remote locking fob to your temple you can unlock your car from a lot further away?? Try it
Armitage_Shankburn wrote:This entire fucking forum is an unexplained phenomenon
Do you still hold the belief that the "gofast" video shows a large, low object moving fast, when the recording clearly shows instrumentation's values for altitude, range, and elevation that prove otherwise? This refusal to adjust your opinion in the face of evidence is the definition of close-minded.Dinostar77 wrote:Dunno, but be careful as there will be a video from a keyboard warrior with a ruler and a trigonometry set explaining how it couldnt possibly be your infrared arse but a weather balloon shaped like your arse.
Do these people sell their books and writings, or give them away for free?Dinostar77 wrote:... Some will say all this is "woo", and everyone is entitled to their opinion. However people who have actually dedicated their lives to this mystery (done the hard miles and actual work. Not keyboard warriors) from different angles have come out none the wiser: jacques vallee, stanton friedman, timothy good, john keel etc. ...
That makes sense why they weren't more concerned on first radar contact. I still think even if it was drug runners they should be recording all possible channels, not just the (classified) radar. And am still mystified why none of the 4 people involved turned on any recording kit when they saw the "tictac". Have all 4 done interviews saying they saw the exact same thing?bad_hair_day wrote:Probably my fault not making clear, in various interviews Fravor and others have said all the ships, the Hawkeye plane, and fighters all record Radar constantly, so no need for manual recording, normally. Fravor assumed it was drug runners off the West coast, they weren't armed as it was a training exercise, so could only chase off whatever was in the air anyway.
Or if the things can come out of the water, went back under again?bad_hair_day wrote:They could see nothing when at the CAP. Don't know what happened to the track the USS Princeton had seen - I'd have to go back through the interviews. Fucked off just as fast somewhere else perhaps. The radar ops did the speed calcs because they were tracking objects descending at similar speeds up to a week prior.
Makes sense, and does explain why FLIR doesn't turn or try to get a closer look at the object - although the History Channel reconstruction implied that the 2nd pilot was "going up to find that thing", somewhat massaging the truth there.bad_hair_day wrote:The second jets headed to a scheduled training exercise. They 'happened' to take the FLIR footage on the way because it was coincidentally close, odds on that eh? Tom Cruise isn't up there breaking the rules, and don't have fuel to go hunting or more as importantly, this was a fleet in the middle of a month long meticulously organised and expensive work up for the Persian Gulf.
Minkymu wrote:To think we thought ghosts??? But no. Some weird middle aged woman was sat in my kids bedroom. Hiding? when we went in to check them then letting herself out, locking door behind her.
On the night i found her in the hall she started screaming she was sorry and fled. We called the police. They searched her house and bought every set of keys they could find (6 bunches) and none fitted our door. We think she ran hone and hid them so we changed the locks.
She always referred to our house as “my moms house”
She killed herself 3 weeks after we changed the locks
Minkymu wrote:Yup scary man
Obviously we could never say for sure the old lady my youngest spoke of was her, but the out fit matched what he described.
We went on holiday once and someone tidied my shed. The only way to it was through the house as i had no back gate. I told myself i was wrong. But i bet the mad bitch spent every night in my house while we were away for the week.
Prob slept in my bed.
Makes me cringe.
Dinostar77 wrote:This has the making of a horror movieMinkymu wrote:Yup scary man Obviously we could never say for sure the old lady my youngest spoke of was her, but the out fit matched what he described. We went on holiday once and someone tidied my shed. The only way to it was through the house as i had no back gate. I told myself i was wrong. But i bet the mad bitch spent every night in my house while we were away for the week. Prob slept in my bed. Makes me cringe.
LivDiv wrote:Wasnt there something a year or two back about people finding random strangers in their homes? It was somewhere like York.
They found a load of houses were interconnected with tunnels originally used by monks or something hiding from persecution. The tunnels were being used by cheeky homeless scamps to enter people's homes and do stuff like eat out of their fridges.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!