Weird Stuff (tinfoil hat wearing goons only, please)
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    Is it safe to say no one went thirsty after that?
  • Unfortunately the owner of Bargain Booze was the landlord of the flat and a decent guy. I think we nabbed a few crates the first night but left it there.
    Edit: actually I remember we nabbed ingredients for a drink we used to make called Gummy.
    Pint glass
    Quad vodka
    330ml bottle of WKD Blue
    Top up with red bull.

    Weird stuff definitely happened after that shit.
  • Kow
    Show networks
    Twitter
    Kowdown
    Xbox
    Kowdown
    PSN
    Kowdown
    Steam
    Kowdown

    Send message
    Dinostar77 wrote:
    Kow, not sure if you have seen it but you might like it for shits and giggles. https://videobin.co/qwp1y8i7kplt Its episode 1. Secret of Skinwalker Ranch
    Episode 1? It's a series?
  • Kow wrote:
    Dinostar77 wrote:
    Kow, not sure if you have seen it but you might like it for shits and giggles. https://videobin.co/qwp1y8i7kplt Its episode 1. Secret of Skinwalker Ranch
    Episode 1? It's a series?

    Yep 7 parts i think

  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    Morning badgers, me again :D
    djchump wrote:
    @Hair: BTW, thank you for the replies, it clarified a few things for me.

    You're very welcome :) Scepticism should always be the starting position for any incredible claims.

    Looking for answers to your supplemental questions, something to consider with multiple accounts both written and presented. Some details will be unintentionally contradictory by process of the different views, time elapsed etc but it's the series of chained events as a whole which focuses my interest in understanding what happened in 2004.
    djchump wrote:
    That makes sense why they weren't more concerned on first radar contact. I still think even if it was drug runners they should be recording all possible channels, not just the (classified) radar. And am still mystified why none of the 4 people involved turned on any recording kit when they saw the "tictac". Have all 4 done interviews saying they saw the exact same thing?

    All the pilots (in the report) were looking around and down out of the canopy as nothing was on the plane radar at their 'merge plot'. Some much larger object seemed to be under the water and causing white surf on the blue sea (the size of a 737) which is the only reason they got the visual on the comparatively small 40ft white 'Tic Tac'. Fravor told the other plane to remain in a circling holding position while he and his WSO took a closer look.

    Helmet cam recording causes nausea, something about looking at cockpit screens, instruments simultaneously. Fravor mentions this and much more in the interview below.

    djchump wrote:
    Makes sense, and does explain why FLIR doesn't turn or try to get a closer look at the object

    It can't turn much, as it's a fixed targeting system
    and forward facing
    9BRvV8X.jpg

    djchump wrote:
    - although the History Channel reconstruction implied that the 2nd pilot was "going up to find that thing", somewhat massaging the truth there.

    Still engaged in the fleet training exercise, Fravor and his crew naturally mentioned this encounter to the outgoing second squadron, wanting to please the boss seems valid. Far as they knew (not having a direct coms to the Cruiser radar ops - as this point, all the Pilots were on the Carrier) the object was possibly still at their CAP.
    djchump wrote:
    Given that they couldn't get a range on the object in FLIR video, and were at high zoom, it doesn't seem at all "coincidentally close" TBH.

    It was hovering near there CAP when the second sorte (about 30 miles I think) FLIR picked up the (same?)object. Worth knowing this sensor isn't normally used for combat but IR ground targeting at a closer range. The F18 radar could 'see' it but was being jammed by the UFO so couldn't get a (weapon) lock. They were on auto pilot (not going very fast, because every unnecessary aggressive manoeuvre has a fuel cost) and heading to the training area. Seemingly in the FLIR clip, the object felt they were getting to close and made off. Appears to me like it was messing with the pilots.



    Any debunking of this capture should note the FI8 was nose facing as was the FLIR, perfectly consistent with the pilot testimony, who said the thing just exited the FOV and was gone.

    Fravor talks about the whole event in great detail this fascinating and informative pilot to pilot discussion. A must listen IMO.



    Off for a toot!


    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • Clearly it was Aquaman.
    Xbox - Boozy The Clown
    Forza4Lyfe
  • Dinostar77 wrote:
    Kow, not sure if you have seen it but you might like it for shits and giggles.

    https://videobin.co/qwp1y8i7kplt

    Its episode 1. Secret of Skinwalker Ranch

    https://mixdrop.co/f/pk49kz4ki9vj4r

    Epsiode 2

    https://videobin.co/bwoiog6hf6u7

    Episode 3

    https://mixdrop.co/f/l6n7vp17hdw9x6

    Episode 4

    https://mixdrop.co/f/4nv86xgruqklo4v

    Episode 5

    This is quite entertaining series. Will add links as i go.

    Episode 6 and 7 havent aired yet

    Up to end of episode 2. Spoiler for up to end of episode 2.
    Spoiler:
  • Feck this show is so bloody good. Its interesting to see the scientists at work and being baffled but persevering.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    It can't turn much, as it's a fixed targeting system
    and forward facing
    9BRvV8X.jpg

    I'm not sure how true that is. The camera has a wide FOV and can be slew to capture targets that aren't directly in front of the aircraft.
    The F18 radar could 'see' it but was being jammed by the UFO so couldn't get a (weapon) lock. They were on auto pilot (not going very fast, because every unnecessary aggressive manoeuvre has a fuel cost) and heading to the training area.

    No, In the testimony provided below "Lt XXXX stated that there were no jamming cues". And that the radar just couldn't hack it.
    Any debunking of this capture should note the FI8 was nose facing as was the FLIR, perfectly consistent with the pilot testimony, who said the thing just exited the FOV and was gone.

    Again, not quite true. In the image you provided (posted below) they state "Lt XXXX made no attempt to slew the FLIR and subsequently lost situational awareness of the object.

    2kcYr9t.jpg
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    The term "forward-looking" is used to distinguish fixed forward-looking thermal imaging systems from sideways-tracking infrared systems, also known as "push broom" imagers, and other thermal imaging systems such as gimbal-mounted imaging systems, handheld imaging systems and the like. Pushbroom systems typically have been used on aircraft and satellites.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    Goobs, the FILR has FOV limits at operating on it's boundaries which was my point really.  

    There were no conventional jamming cues?  Not conversant with what happens when another jet attempts an active jam, but all the pilots said they couldn't get a lock on the objects. Fravor has mentioned a few times he though because of this inability (advanced tech?) it was jamming them.

    'As LT XXXX watched the object it began to move out of the FLIR field of view to the left LT XXXX made no attempt to slew the FLIR and subsequently lost situational awareness of the object' 

    'Made no attempt to slew'. Doubt it was he couldn't be bothered after the convos with the skipper/ what had transpired earlier. Sounds too inconsistent and probably a fault of the investigator misunderstanding or just clumsy grammar? 

    Fravor says in this interview I linked earlier, the report is good, but there are natural inconsistencies due to time passed, and various viewpoints and can only justify his own recollection. Happy with that honest view, and why I mentioned this could happen in my previous preamble.

    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    https://www.northropgrumman.com/wp-content/uploads/LITENING_Grand_Canyon_NGC.wmv

    That link shows FLIR video from a Northrop Grumman Litening pod, the same fitted to an F/A 18F. It clearly shows a side on tracking shot, taken at at least 45° (but looks closer to 90 to me) to the angle of flight. The FOV limitations aren't so severe that they couldn't have tracked this object if they had wanted to at the time, but they "made no attempt to" according to the document you posted.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    but all the pilots said they couldn't get a lock on the objects.

    Then why did you say
    The F18 radar could 'see' it but was being jammed by the UFO so couldn't get a (weapon) lock

    When no one appears to have claimed this to be the case (at least not at the time) ?
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    The clip ends when the object is out of frame. Made no attempt to slew could be the investigator's view looking at the clip embedded in the report. It's not a direct quote?
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    They would have made that assessment having full knowledge of the of the systems capabilities, and state at the time of capture, and would therefore know if the WO was able to slew or not.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    Just like to say these convos are akin to, 'I was punched in the face once'  
    'Witnesses say you were slapped, and took some upper cuts though?'
    'Yeah, but was I punched'
    'Hmmmm'.
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • What I find odd is the jumps to conclusions that it was a some kind of vehicle or device.

    The radar thing stands out.
    Radar couldn't detect it.
    Conclusuon: It was jamming radar.

    Why is that the conclusion and not something more logical like it being made of something not detectable by radar?

    The reason seems to be the desire for this to be high tech alien stuff.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    No. All the information regarding the recording (angle, zoom, elevation etc) are contained within the recording for the investigator to reference.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    But that's the extent of the recording, which was partly the catalyst getting the investigation started five years later. It appeared on YouTube in 2007-2008 (which was probably put on a pen drive in 2004 from the FLIR tape before it was reused) and taken down once the ATTIP got wind.

    Got an article about the whole complicated business, I'll fish around for it.

    Look chaps, doing my best to address the details but look at the wood, not the trees so much?
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    LivDiv wrote:
    What I find odd is the jumps to conclusions that it was a some kind of vehicle or device.

    The radar thing stands out.
    Radar couldn't detect it.
    Conclusuon: It was jamming radar.

    Why is that the conclusion and not something more logical like it being made of something not detectable by radar?

    The reason seems to be the desire for this to be high tech alien stuff.

    Because the pilots who got eyballs on it for around five minutes said it was a '40ft white tic tac'.
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • Ah yeah. White is well known for being detected by radar.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    It's behaviour using unknown propulsion or wings would suggest it's very advanced tech.
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    Goobs, here's that long article on the FLIR tape history and others. Acronyms ahoy!

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a30538203/navy-ufo-video-investigation/
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • Again you assume it is tech.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    Guess I am. ;)
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    But that's the extent of the recording, which was partly the catalyst getting the investigation started five years later. It appeared on YouTube in 2007-2008 (which was probably put on a pen drive in 2004 from the FLIR tape before it was reused) and taken down once the ATTIP got wind.

    Got an article about the whole complicated business, I'll fish around for it.

    Look chaps, doing my best to address the details but look at the wood, not the trees so much?

    Which contains all the information regarding the orientation of the sensor that the investigator would need to determine if it was at its capability limits or not, and thus whether the WO was unable to slew, or simply made no attempt to do so.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    Look chaps, doing my best to address the details but look at the wood, not the trees so much?

    But you're claiming its a wood of oak, unless we look at the trees to see if they can be proved to be oak, then I'm not going to agree that it's an oak wood.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    But that's the extent of the recording, which was partly the catalyst getting the investigation started five years later.

    Which contains all the information regarding the orientation of the sensor that the investigator would need to determine if it was at its capability limits or not, and thus whether the WO was unable to slew, or simply made no attempt to do so.

    We (plus the investigators) can only see what the WSO did or the Instrument readings up the point the video ends, not after. That's the extent of it, that's my understanding from what I've read and heard from Fravor.

    It's on page 10 of the investigation.

    https://media.lasvegasnow.com/nxsglobal/lasvegasnow/document_dev/2018/05/18/TIC TAC UFO EXECUTIVE REPORT_1526682843046_42960218_ver1.0.pdf
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.
  • GooberTheHat
    Show networks
    Twitter
    GooberTheHat
    Xbox
    GooberTheHat
    Steam
    GooberTheHat

    Send message
    And that's the crux of the issue, I don't consider Fravor a reliable witness, you do.
  • bad_hair_day
    Show networks
    Twitter
    @_badhairday_
    Xbox
    Bad Hair Day
    PSN
    Bad-Hair-Day
    Steam
    badhairday247

    Send message
    Not forgetting the other pilots various testimonies, but yes I trust his credibility along with his friends, colleagues and his superiors because what to reason do we have not to?
    retroking1981: Fuck this place I'm off to the pub.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!