Diluted Dante wrote:Did they commission a poll that left them second with a rigged question?
Austerity loving, cynical opportunists. Menzies Campbell was the last of them with any integrity.Andy wrote:I don’t understand the bile directed at the Lib Dems.
LivDiv wrote:She is now claiming it is unfair to exclude her from TV debates because she is the only woman that could be PM.
Andy wrote:I don’t understand the bile directed at the Lib Dems.
Kara_Jane_Adams wrote:You take Jo Swinson, she voted for raising VAT, raising the cap on tuition fees, for reducing housing benefit, against paying higher benefits for those unable to work due to illness or disability, against raising welfare benefits (she did however vote to reduce them), against increasing the top level of income tax, against the bankers bonus tax, against the mansion tax, for reducing corporation tax, for HS2, against transferring more powers to the Scottish Parliament, against incentives for low carbon emissions, for culling badgers, against regulation for fracking, against greater regulation of the gambling industry, for the privatisation of Royal Mail, for restrictions to legal aid
Recent opinion polls have shown that the PM is trusted by more voters than Jeremy Corbyn on the NHS
monkey wrote:There are no good Brexit policies but revoking article 50 is the only one that makes sense.
revoking A50 is a ludicrous, even dangerous sop to remainer extremists who simply cannot imagine a world where they have to actually live with the reality of what other people actually think
Yeah I agree with your quote as well. They might sound a bit contradictory but they aren't. You can't cancel Brexit and stuff the genie back into the bottle and go back to everything being fine and dandy. Just like how the middle-classes thought everything was pre-2016. Chukka Umunna can't rescind article 50 then get back to his dinner party. That's a recipe for riots.Funkstain wrote:I agree with this. Personally.There are no good Brexit policies but revoking article 50 is the only one that makes sense.I also stand by this, and I know that you at least understand the dilemma. As a Socratic experiment, indulge this question: do you think it is a good idea for the country (as a whole) for the LibDems to stand on A50 revocation? Do you think it even represents the best chance to achieve that goal?revoking A50 is a ludicrous, even dangerous sop to remainer extremists who simply cannot imagine a world where they have to actually live with the reality of what other people actually think
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!