It literally is. Just not for climate change reasons.GooberTheHat wrote:Maybe making everyone poorer is the government's way to reduce consumption?
GooberTheHat wrote:Maybe making everyone poorer is the government's way to reduce consumption?
Yeah there'll be a tipping point and then emissions will fall like crazy. Then a swing back when the climate is still getting worse and it hasn't had an immediate impact.GurtTractor wrote:I still think it'll have to get to the point of a major catastrophe in some rich countries before there'll be a panic response of mass cloud seeding or putting dust into the atmosphere to induce a cooling effect. It'll be like COVID where no one took the threat of a pandemic that seriously then had to react like crazy to it after it had already spread.
GurtTractor wrote:I still think it'll have to get to the point of a major catastrophe in some rich countries before there'll be a panic response of mass cloud seeding or putting dust into the atmosphere to induce a cooling effect. It'll be like COVID where no one took the threat of a pandemic that seriously then had to react like crazy to it after it had already spread.
SpaceGazelle wrote:Of course, the simplest and most effective thing to do is just to reduce your personal emissions, today. People generally won't, because why must their little Timothy suffer when all the other kids are having fun? But poor Timothy is going to suffer. Poor little Timothy is going to get it up the arse with both barrels.
Paul the sparky wrote:You start us off
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!