Moot_Geeza wrote:Not the first one silly.hylian_elf wrote:No, because it was always shit and was before Edge.
It's awful now I think. When it first came out on the iPhone, it was about 100 fun physics based puzzles. Now it's loaded with expansions and tokens and all the other shit you expect with a mobile game.Moot_Geeza wrote:*Googles Cut the Rope*
monkey wrote:Mario 64 does not belong in these lists anymore. Most Important Games Ever - it's right up there. Best Games? - Galaxy, 3D Land, World and Odyssey are all more playable and enjoyable games in 2023 than 64.
LivDiv wrote:Greatest by mass. Steel Battalion? Edit: Rock Band, band in a box?
monkey wrote:All I know is 64 is the worst or second-worst of all the mainline Marios that qualify.
If there's two hundred games from the Edge and B&B lists, there needs to be more than one badly-aged Mario.
monkey wrote:There's no Gears in the Edge list which seems silly to me. And there's no Vanquish which seems like a scandal that should bring down the magazine.
LivDiv wrote:Why is Dishonored 2 on the Edge list?
I'm not going to say it's a pile of shit but one of the 100 greatest games of the last 30 years?
No.
LivDiv wrote:Why is Dishonored 2 on the Edge list? I'm not going to say it's a pile of shit but one of the 100 greatest games of the last 30 years? No.
hylian_elf wrote:It's not their list, though, it's a list collated from readers' and writers' votes. And yes, overrepresentation can happen - 3 Zeldas in top 20 with another further down the list seems OTT. But I woukd have just Zelda games in my all time top 10.Only criticism I can think of is some ip is overrepresented but hey, it's their list.
I should probably withdraw this if I'm being consistent as this looks like another one that has aged terribly.monkey wrote:Spider-man 2 (PS2) maybe.
EvilRedEye wrote:Super Mario Land is 1989! Come on guys…
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!