Andy wrote:My issues with explanations such as “that’s a different Loki,” are that a) it just always sounds like an excuse to get around the inherent problems with time travel, and b) I’m pretty sure they were going out of their way to say that that’s not happening here. The one time branching timelines are explicitly spoken about, it’s immediately followed by the explanation of the workaround.
Does he get any kind of human+ type powers or abilities in the comics? Because a guy with a rock hard shield isn't really going to cut it.Diluted Dante wrote:We do know Falcon became Captain America in the comics right?
EvilRedEye wrote:I wonder if they'll pick the most successful from the comics and leave the rest. Seem to remember the diverse Iron Man (lady?) not taking off. Perhaps they'll do a mix of successful ones like black Captain America, Miles from Spider-man etc. and do the first instance versions of some they haven't done yet for the rest.
They've confirmed an Asian superhero for Phase 4, I forget the name, a previously unadapted one.
Andy wrote:Sorry, Dave, I’m not buying any of that.
Diluted Dante wrote:Oh yeah. The Marvel films are all about you giving a shit about the people on screen. it's the main thing differentiating them from DC, who just seem to go "care about this because it's Batman."
b0r1s wrote:Good write up Crayon. I think the emotional story is the important story. The time travel macgiffin is just that. A plot device to hold the story together.
Diluted Dante wrote:Oh yeah. The Marvel films are all about you giving a shit about the people on screen. it's the main thing differentiating them from DC, who just seem to go "care about this because it's Batman."
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!