Kow wrote:Under a bridge don't you know.
Liveinadive wrote:I would like to take this oppurtunity to state that if you searched what i suggested (printer buttons) it merely shows a man with a perfectly average-sized dick. Lolsome but not macabre
My over estimation of dick is well documentedigorgetmeabrain wrote:Liveinadive wrote:I would like to take this oppurtunity to state that if you searched what i suggested (printer buttons) it merely shows a man with a perfectly average-sized dick. Lolsome but not macabre
Eh? I have no beef. Not sure Andy does either. False accusations, of falseness. Carry on up the wossname.Unlikely wrote:So we're all good now. Apart from Andy (no surprise there) and Skerret (actual surprise there). Hooray. Maria, I guess you realised how stupid your question was, which is why you haven't followed up on it, but if I've missed something let me know.
tigerswiftly wrote:I want Tempy banned for this.
ewrevelthedog wrote:Nah. Bannings too good. An hour licking the blue waffle should sort him.tigerswiftly wrote:I want Tempy banned for this.
tin_robot wrote:The gist of it seems to be... Tempy posted some links to some disgusting photos which he found sort of interesting, hoping to discuss the cause of said foul images. The thread quickly entered the realm of the macabre. Those who don't click on links to horrible images because they're horrible chastised tempy. The non-viewers misconstrued the content as snuff, and were understandably appalled. Debate, name-calling and apologies ensued. Some people were sent to urinate. G-man succeeded. Normal service was restored via Puppies and Daddy's Sauce. Something like that.Petey wrote:So what's going on then?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!