bad_hair_day wrote:Except the radar ops corroborate their stories.
Also the video.
bad_hair_day wrote:Except the radar ops corroborate their stories. Also the video.
bad_hair_day wrote:If they are creating their own gravitational field, Newtonian physics don't apply, er apparently.What are the physics of such an object moving at such a speed? If reports are to be believed we know it has a physical effect on the water as the describe white water similar to a helicopter hovering. It then goes under water and shoots off at some insane speed. That would surely vaporize the water causing an insane explosion, in air it would cause a sonic boom.
Yossarian wrote:The only thing that the radar ops can corroborate is that they saw signals on their radar screens. That’s it. It’s not corroboration, it’s one additional piece of evidence which fits more than one potential set of possibilities.
Do tell Scout.Scout wrote:I'm on Team Hair. I believe. But I'm biased as I saw a UFO once and no-one's gonna convince me I didn't.
Andy wrote:I’m not saying it’s all conjured out of thin air...
bad_hair_day wrote:I'll come to this later if I may?The only thing that the radar ops can corroborate is that they saw signals on their radar screens. That’s it. It’s not corroboration, it’s one additional piece of evidence which fits more than one potential set of possibilities.
Only catching up on the thread now. What you say makes total sense. My explanation for that at time of listening was him being in the military and the associated documentation. This is all assumption on my part, I have no idea if its factual. The detail of the mission, equipment involved etc would be all recorded in reports. He would have to write up an incident report Id imagine and he possibly has a copy himself. Also, there is the video and his co-pilots etc, radar operators etc he could talk to form his story. Being military Id assume he would be well versed in noting detail.Andy wrote:I didn’t listen for very much longer, it was just my reaction to what you and superfly considered a very credible witness. While calmness, assuredness and certainty certainly tend to boost our confidence in someone’s reliability, I’d be very suspicious of someone claiming to recall so many specific details with such clarity, and maintaining chronological continuity, after 15 months, let alone fifteen years. He’s not recounting an event as he remembers it, he’s telling a well-rehearsed story, and I’d have grave doubts about how much is what he saw, and how much is blanks filled by hearing his colleagues accounts’ of the same event. I’ve had a crowd tell me a man had a gun. An automatic rifle, specifically. What he actually had was a baseball bat. I will always be sceptical of people describing something with which they are unfamiliar, especially when they’ve heard others’ accounts. Because of the way memory works, they won’t even know they are doing it.Andy, which part of Favor's account in do you think might be fabricated? He seem's almost downplaying the events.
superflyninja wrote:What I'm more concerned with is this surfacing at all and his motives, why come out at all and give his story? Why is the video officially released by the military?
superflyninja wrote:
The chances that its aliens are remote.
It's not the most exciting story. It was about 20 years ago when I still lived with my parents. I was a secret smoker. Every night I'd sneak on to the roof of the house to smoke and star-gaze. It was my favourite thing to do. We lived a little out of the city so on clear nights we always had a fantastically dark sky. I was used to seeing shooting stars and satellites.bad_hair_day wrote:Do tell Scout.Scout wrote:I'm on Team Hair. I believe. But I'm biased as I saw a UFO once and no-one's gonna convince me I didn't.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!