Well that's settled then.  Carry on everyone.Unlikely wrote:Fuck off Nick. Fuck off Andy. Fuck off Skerret. Tempy, you're lovely.  Maria, eh? I think that covers it.
revelthedog wrote:It just shows that while we are all up for a bit of violent gaming, we have the morals to check ourselves over 'real life' violent or offensive content. Daily Mail can go suck a fuck.
Liveinadive wrote:I propose a "Censorship" thread to discuss this kind of thing. Not a "gufffaww hes got no head" thread nor a "OMG you sick fuck" thread but a place to discuss, sensibley the issues surrounding censorship.
Tempy wrote:... so the idea that I might have offended a large number or represented myself as some twisted immature shit that trawls the deepnet to post filth on 4chan really affected me hence me profuse attempts to correct it. It was misguided, I accept that and apologise again.
Liveinadive wrote:Sorry I didnt mean a censorship of the forum type thing, more censorship in the greater world.
For example press censorship, the lack of censorship on the net, self censorship.
Stories or articles that bring up the subject, like the space shuttle article earlier in this thread.
Little Franklin wrote:Is someone interested in the morbid necessarily a bad person? Just because they might want to see it doesn't mean they would ever wish harm on anyone. I am no longer shocked by graphic movies and games but I remember a time when I was. Plenty of people would think anyone who wants to perform violent acts in games is sick.
Tempy wrote:And then you've got visual censorship and almost ignorance of war crimes and torture, but almost glorified images of dead dictators, what's that all about?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!