Kazuo wrote:After last summer I was all set to do a podcast with my best mates but then one of them died so we couldn't do it and I was sad. What I'm saying is let's do it oh and please none of you die cos that'll mess things up ok.
Shiiiiiiiiiiit. Â Someone give the guy a medal. Â It's why I've been doing my podcast and content on my website. Â Just can't stomach all the abuse and unwarranted criticism from those who happen to display less creativity...EvilRedEye wrote:Given that there's no way of preventing people from embarking on creative enterprises though, surely the best thing is to keep them under the banner of this forum, so that they can be kept fair and democratic. If you don't allow people to do stuff under the banner of the forum they'll simply do it outside of it, which will just make it more likely that bickering and in-fighting will occur.
What about something that's a little bit more like N4G?WorKid wrote:If the aim isn't to drive traffic to this place, then, well, what is the aim, and why is it being associated with B&B? I'm not deliberately being negative, I'm just asking. I quite liked the blog (e-mag, whatever) idea, not sure what the point of a few people here putting together a podcast would actually be.
I only ever wanted the "community" to show a modicum of productivity, and for illustriously creative members to get REAL recognition.  The kind of recognition that Edge refuses to give...monkey wrote:Think there probably needs to be some discussion about what this place will become and who wants what from it. It's run by one man at the moment. That might be able to carry on indefinitely but might be a lot to ask. And although its Petey's baby (and he's the only one to have stumped up any cash), its essentially community owned. So we'd need some consensus on what people want for the future. Or at least deciding on a mechanism for deciding stuff. These questions haven't been asked yet. And I can't really see many people having major objections to a blog or whatever. I don't. But depending on how big it gets you're getting into the realms of editorial tone and the sort of people you're going to attract. We want new people but we don't necessarily want the worst of the internet gaming fraternity turning up talking their usual shit.
monkey wrote:That's bullshit.Alternate Universe innit
Why would I want to, when I am so "wretched"? Â Nobody listens to what I have to say anyway, and then I get called an Az-hole when I dish out what is dished to me on a regular basis...g.man wrote:Perhaps Prankster, you could give us some advise about how to go about these creative endeavours? regards g.man
fixed.Prankster101 wrote:Um... Â I think some people aren't open to reading other peoples lunatic ravings against a video games magazine (a video games magazine! Of all the fucking things to have a 6 year vendetta against), or feel the need to produce their own...
Case in point...monkey wrote:fixed.Prankster101 wrote:Um... Â I think some people aren't open to reading other peoples lunatic ravings against a video games magazine (a video games magazine! Of all the fucking things to have a 6 year vendetta against), or feel the need to produce their own...
Prankster101 wrote:Nobody listens to what I have to say anyway,
"Why would I save a world I no longer have any stake in?"g.man wrote:Come on Prankster. Lead by example. you know you want to g.man
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!