ZMM wrote:I thought podcasts were for people who were already famous in some way to make.
Prankster101 wrote:I only ever wanted the "community" to show a modicum of productivity, and for illustriously creative members to get REAL recognition. Â The kind of recognition that Edge refuses to give...
You're mellowing with age.. oh dear.Unlikely wrote:You may have a point, you mong.
revelthedog wrote:I think you have ideas to succeed but i don't really see the article after article being pushed out there by Prankster Productions, I don't see you proving yourself by saying - well this month I penned 10 articles on gaming and the like and here are the links.  Read them, tell me what you think. Fuck you if you don't like them.  Next month there will be another 10 and I'm speaking to etc etc etc.   I'm doing it whether you guys think I'm a joke or not. I'm going somewhere.   Then you have a site that people might start to find out a bit more about your writing style, start to like how you write, not necessarily what its about, AND will read you for your views and thoughts on certain matters.  I don't see that 10 article in 2 years as justification for anyone to take you seriously.  So take the reins.Â
the name was inspired by "kojima productions"...ÂDiluted Dante wrote:In all seriousness, this is one of my issues with Pranky. Aside from the horrible name that should be changed immediately, another issue is Prankster 101 Productions doesn't seem to do much. You can talk all you want about Re-Play, but it never went anywhere. You seem to be more focused on the design of the website than on actually producing content. You also really need a filter between brain and keyboard. You have potential, but some of the things you've put on your website are monumentally dumb. Be it your continued snipes at people who've taken shots at you, or the booth babes piece, sometimes you need to sit down and think 'should I really be posting this? You need to be doing more things like the interview with Zico Chain.I think you have ideas to succeed but i don't really see the article after article being pushed out there by Prankster Productions, I don't see you proving yourself by saying - well this month I penned 10 articles on gaming and the like and here are the links.  Read them, tell me what you think. Fuck you if you don't like them.  Next month there will be another 10 and I'm speaking to etc etc etc.   I'm doing it whether you guys think I'm a joke or not. I'm going somewhere.   Then you have a site that people might start to find out a bit more about your writing style, start to like how you write, not necessarily what its about, AND will read you for your views and thoughts on certain matters.  I don't see that 10 article in 2 years as justification for anyone to take you seriously.  So take the reins.Â
What? No seriously...what?ad revenue has really taken a nose-dive over the last few months
ÂSkerret wrote:@Pranky: You still haven't addressed concerns (as highlighted by Johnny come lately up there) about the awfully misogynistic piece on booth babes. That isn't a matter of taste either, so don't tell me 'oh but someone liked it I'm sure'. Any sensible person would find that cringeworthy and offensive for all the right reasons. Regardless of how well intentioned you were, it came off as mean spirited, tasteless and objectively unfunny (as in craft-wise; poor choice of language, poorly constructed. I imagine I'll get kicked for that one though), if humour was your intention. So, explanation plox.
a website is like a grain of sand on a beach... Â at least with my 1 issue of re-play, i was able to get my name out there in front of 10,000 people, and be featured in mcv afterwards. Â that's real recognition. Â not the kind of recognition that edge would ever give.Mod74 wrote:What? No seriously...what? You should have been doing an online magazine a decade ago, not realising there's no money for ads in free print mags in the last couple of months. Think what kind of website 20k investment would buy. More than a WordPress blog with a free off the shelf template, that's for sure.ad revenue has really taken a nose-dive over the last few months
Kow wrote:So if some women think something is ok then it's not misogynistic?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!