retroking1981 wrote:I think this gets overlooked, think of the Wii U situation. It was dire but Nintendo did well to see it through to the bitter end.hunk wrote:In hindsight, they arguably also should've downscaled and supported the Saturn for the whole of its generation and left the dc to cook that little bit longer. Consumer trust is a fickle thing and betraying gamers twice in a row was commercial suicide in hindsight. The Dreamcast was basically DoA.
davyK wrote:Pacman Museum missing certain games. CE is superb but CE Dx+ really should be there too as it has a lot more content and depth. Pacman Vs missing too (though that would require two Switches).
Nice to see Battle Royale and Arrangement get an airing though.
Blue Swirl wrote:Oh man, Vs would have been immense. I had that at uni, and even people who didn't like video games enjoyed that.
davyK wrote:Not sure why switch hasnt got it as a bonus game or for subbers. A superb game. Wii U got a version of it in nintendoland. It was a freebie on gamecube.
Blue Swirl wrote:I guess it's the same problem it's always had - you need a lot of hardware to do it properly. If you wanted to play it on Switch like the original, you'd need two Switches, a TV, and three controllers. That's a big ask for a lot of people, especially during the wallet-squeezing pandemic.
You could play it online, but that'd lack the same-room excitement. Playing with randoms would be awful: everyone would just want to be Pacman and quit out when it was their turn to be a ghost.
Blue Swirl wrote:RE0 was top back on the 'cube, but I have no idea how it'd stand up today.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!