regmcfly wrote:You cannot say "roughly the same price" as that could be the different between someone's disposable income and eating into their savings. FOR EVERYONE IT IS DIFFERENT How do people not understand this?
MattyJ wrote:I don't understand where £80 = Kinect comes from?
Tempy wrote:It doesn't £80 = Kinect, because it's a mandatory purchase and people are going to assume it's built into the RRP, as the PS4 doesn't have a PSeye and is £80 cheaper.
Because the Xbox One costs £429 and the PS4 costs £349, because Sony haven't bundled in everything to make their console/joypad function fully from the off people are presuming that this is where the £80 is going.MattyJ wrote:I don't understand where £80 = Kinect comes from?
Dark Soldier wrote:Where'd you get the £80 for weed over three nights?! Bloody hell.
Elmlea wrote:Tempy wrote:It doesn't £80 = Kinect, because it's a mandatory purchase and people are going to assume it's built into the RRP, as the PS4 doesn't have a PSeye and is £80 cheaper.
Didn't they say somewhere it'd be included?
Tempy wrote:As Reg said, everyone is different, and If I were saving for one, i'd save for the cheapest because next gen gaming is not that high on my priority list, and kinect is even lower, below turds and bugs.
Tempy wrote:Well absolutely, I could have gone on to list all the prices of things that would ruin me, right down to £200 for a 500GB PS3 and 3 games, but I'm just repelling the idea that £80 doesn't matter, when it quite clearly does to a lot of people, including I imagine the main market who buy consoles: parents at christmas. As Reg said, everyone is different, and If I were saving for one, i'd save for the cheapest because next gen gaming is not that high on my priority list, and kinect is even lower, below turds and bugs.
Plan M wrote:I'm out of touch with prices of drugs these days mate!Dark Soldier wrote:Where'd you get the £80 for weed over three nights?! Bloody hell.
Tempy wrote:@mattyj Well where is my £80 going if the specs are revealed to be lower than the PS4's? The only variable is the Kinect, and I see no merit in owning one over meatier specced hardware.
Tempy wrote:@mattyj Well where is my £80 going if the specs are revealed to be lower than the PS4's?
The only variable is the Kinect, and I see no merit in owning one over meatier specced hardware
Plan M wrote:We need to remember the prices of stuff when we were kids as well. If we wanted a top of the range machine (i.e. an Amiga 500) it would set our folks back 500 quid.
Dark Soldier wrote:I'll take one too Elm. Will pay you back around 2025.
Elmlea wrote:Alright shouty, sorry. It's just the way I see it; if you have (say) £300 disposable income per month, you could save a bit for 2 months and buy a PS4. You could save for a fraction longer and get an Xbox One. It's not like we're looking at an item that's £150 and one that's £1000. People who are genuinely short of cash, who're studying or not working etc, that's pretty understandable that every extra £1 counts and they won't be buying either. But if you do have a decent amount of disposable income, even if you'd need to save for a couple of months to make sure you could afford it, I'm surprised that people are finding an £80 price difference to be such a stopper.regmcfly wrote:You cannot say "roughly the same price" as that could be the different between someone's disposable income and eating into their savings. FOR EVERYONE IT IS DIFFERENT How do people not understand this?
Sasukekun wrote:£300 disposable income per month? Fucking hell. Me and the wife are lucky to have £100 disposable per month.
Elmlea wrote:If you could pay me back by 2015, when I'll be closing all my American accounts, I'd be tempted.Dark Soldier wrote:I'll take one too Elm. Will pay you back around 2025.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!